5 reasons manual testing needs to evolve

Amount of testing automation keeps growing each year. There are many reasons for that as we discussed it in our recent CPO and co-founder interview. Despite that, a lot of QA teams hold on full manual testing processes. We decided to think of some reasons why it might be an inefficient approach.

Routine Manual QA Demotivates Teams

People don’t become software developers because they want to do repetitive manual tasks: regression testing, software validation, etc. Routine manual testing is tedious, time consuming, and frankly, boring. If you still expect your team to test manually, there’s a good chance they’re bored, frustrated, and just tired of doing something manually when there’s a great automated option.

That said, implementing Automated QA will help the best and most enthusiastic QA people learn and grow as engineers while decreasing the staff turnover rates.

Manual Testing Is Not Scalable

Manual testing is a hands on process. So, it stands to reason that if you want to do more of it, you need more hands. That might be in the form of more testers, or you might need manual-to-automation tools (R&P tools, FakeData, QA Wolf etc.). Regardless of which option you choose (or if you choose both) that’s going to push your costs up eventually.

Manual Testing Is Out of DevOps

Manual testing takes time and people – but it also takes space and computing power. Which means you either need to have a lot of room in your office for a dedicated testing team, or you need to come up with creative solutions.

This is made worse when you need nightly runs on feature branches, and sometimes it means. Or when you need to handle on-demand retries on severe fails?

 Manual techniques and approaches are hard to link with automation in Dev and Ops environment, and generally result in lots of pain for people involved.

It’s the Choice of Industry Leaders

Every software enterprise from Microsoft to Uber (and everyone in between) goes for automated testing to get the products to market.

Automated testing is faster, more accurate, and since it doesn’t tie your team up doing costly but not very creative testing, it saves money too. Which is probably why all the big names are moving in that direction.

Manual QA Should Lead and Manage Testing Automation

If you’re still testing manually, and you want to make the shift, be sure to bring your current testing team on board to manage the switch. Manual QA teams are often built close to business units, so they are well informed on business focus. That means, with the switch, manual testers will help the team focus on business-critical quality for two reasons:

    1. Manual testers know how to test right. Test design and expertise is needed everywhere, not just in the QA team: help your developers build better unti-testing and help your Ops team to create better quality gates.

    2. Manual testers know what needs to be tested. Developers’ tests are built to verify “the happy path” while testers urge to find all the flaws in the flow. Share your vision and help your team build automated scripts that explore all the hidden bugs.

Learn more about Allure tools

Qameta Software focuses on developing amazing tools that help software testers. Learn more about Allure Framework, a lightweight automation reporting tool, and Allure TestOps, the all-in-one DevOps-ready testing platform.

Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter (below) or follow us on Twitter, ask for assistance on GitHub Discussions.

Share this article

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join 2,000+ community of TestOpsers. Receive product updates and relevant QA-focused articles and reviews.

Menu